About What AI Found
Help readers distinguish the strength of evidence for a result from how much the AI contributed.
Key differences
Compare each service by the same aspect.
| Aspect | AI Proof Watch | What AI Found |
|---|---|---|
| Subject coverage | Mathematics, theoretical computer science, and theoretical physics. | Mathematics, theoretical computer science, physics, medicine, biology, and other sciences. |
| Main purpose | Curate reported contributions and make claims, sources, and evidence easier to inspect; list linked human follow-up works. | Help readers distinguish the strength of evidence for a result from how much the AI contributed. |
| Assessment method | Four independent ratings cover AI involvement, technical verification, human understanding, and importance. Importance assumes the claim is correct; it is not a verification score. | Each finding receives two independent grades: a verification grade, from claimed to formally verified or refuted, and an autonomy grade, from search scaffold to autonomous. The registry links primary work, announcements, coverage, commentary, and challenges. |
| Email updates | Weekly updates across all topics, or selected-interest alerts that are daily by default and sent only when there is an update. | The registry shows recent additions and changes. We found no email subscription on the reviewed pages. |
When to use each
Use What AI Found for a cross-science registry that separates evidence strength from the AI’s role in each result.
By comparison, AI Proof Watch focuses on mathematics, theoretical computer science, and theoretical physics. It uses four independent ratings: AI involvement, technical verification, human understanding, and importance, and supports updates by research interest.
Sources
Feature comparison checked 20 October 2026. Public pages may change.