Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewSource manuscript is machine-written under human supervision and adapts several OpenAI SK results. Exact five checked targets distinguish typical-start lower/upper bounds, clocks, thresholds and fluctuation exponents. Reconcile their new improvements versus the existing OpenAI fluctuation/support records and contribution-specific AI roles before inclusion; registration is not a new discovery by itself.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewExact pinned statement and provenance read. Human manuscript/prior argument and agent proof-slice, formalization, certificate or packaging roles do not yet isolate a central AI mathematical idea for the retained group, graph, embedded-algorithm or algebraic theorem. No automatic inclusion from complete Lean checking.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedThe full versioned record and pinned challenge concern a known human theorem, earlier human argument or selected partial formalization. AI transcription, proof completion under a supplied argument or checking alone does not qualify as a new central AI contribution. This decision is about the reviewed formalization, not a refutation of the mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedThe full versioned record and pinned challenge concern a known human theorem, earlier human argument or selected partial formalization. AI transcription, proof completion under a supplied argument or checking alone does not qualify as a new central AI contribution. This decision is about the reviewed formalization, not a refutation of the mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewFull registry record and pinned challenge checked. Separate companion controller/streaming encodings or Erdős257/269 kernel extensions from prior related statements. Contribution-specific central AI origin, earlier human source and distinct mathematical advance remain unresolved; model proof development alone is insufficient.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewFull registry record and pinned challenge checked. Separate companion controller/streaming encodings or Erdős257/269 kernel extensions from prior related statements. Contribution-specific central AI origin, earlier human source and distinct mathematical advance remain unresolved; model proof development alone is insufficient.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewFull registry record and pinned challenge checked. Separate companion controller/streaming encodings or Erdős257/269 kernel extensions from prior related statements. Contribution-specific central AI origin, earlier human source and distinct mathematical advance remain unresolved; model proof development alone is insufficient.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewFull registry record and pinned challenge checked. Separate companion controller/streaming encodings or Erdős257/269 kernel extensions from prior related statements. Contribution-specific central AI origin, earlier human source and distinct mathematical advance remain unresolved; model proof development alone is insufficient.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewFull registry record and pinned challenge checked. Separate companion controller/streaming encodings or Erdős257/269 kernel extensions from prior related statements. Contribution-specific central AI origin, earlier human source and distinct mathematical advance remain unresolved; model proof development alone is insufficient.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned metadata describes AI-assisted source manuscripts not all publicly available and the checked n log log n induced Erdős–Sauer target. The fetched guessed paper path404 is not a refutation. The separately public sunflower paper identifies its central GPT theorem, but does not establish all contents or attribution of this distinct induced-graph result.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-22 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-22T07:39:59.456Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned challenge and provenance checked. Reconcile the human manuscript, earlier project variants, supplied target and model proof work before attributing a specific retained mathematical advance to AI. Companion encodings or checking targets are not distinct discoveries by themselves.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned challenge and provenance checked. Reconcile the human manuscript, earlier project variants, supplied target and model proof work before attributing a specific retained mathematical advance to AI. Companion encodings or checking targets are not distinct discoveries by themselves.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned source repairs the range of the last sum in Wu’s sieve lemma. Claude’s formalization found a gap, but contribution-specific origin of the essential mathematical repair needs resolution. This does not prove binary Goldbach or refute the whole underlying sieve theorem.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned mathematical statement and project disclosure read. Human manuscript/simplification and model proof-completion or formalization roles do not yet isolate a new central AI argument. Retain exact Kakeya, curved-Hilbert or weighted-endpoint hypotheses; no automatic inclusion from Lean checking.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewChemical-heredity formalization concerns a supplied template-free reproduction model. A qualifying theoretical-physics contribution and central AI origin are not established by agent-written code or registry admission.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned challenge and provenance checked. Reconcile the human manuscript, earlier project variants, supplied target and model proof work before attributing a specific retained mathematical advance to AI. Companion encodings or checking targets are not distinct discoveries by themselves.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned zero-density project reports new native power curves on restricted sigma intervals and standard-axiom checking. Disclosure specifies Codex formalization, closure inspection, rational-frontier auditing and documentation, not the origin of the new mathematical curves. Establish central AI work and compare the actual frontier with later zero-free regions before inclusion. Plots above 7/8 do not improve an already zero region.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned mathematical statement and project disclosure read. Human manuscript/simplification and model proof-completion or formalization roles do not yet isolate a new central AI argument. Retain exact Kakeya, curved-Hilbert or weighted-endpoint hypotheses; no automatic inclusion from Lean checking.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned mathematical statement and project disclosure read. Human manuscript/simplification and model proof-completion or formalization roles do not yet isolate a new central AI argument. Retain exact Kakeya, curved-Hilbert or weighted-endpoint hypotheses; no automatic inclusion from Lean checking.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned challenge and provenance checked. Reconcile the human manuscript, earlier project variants, supplied target and model proof work before attributing a specific retained mathematical advance to AI. Companion encodings or checking targets are not distinct discoveries by themselves.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned challenge and provenance checked. Reconcile the human manuscript, earlier project variants, supplied target and model proof work before attributing a specific retained mathematical advance to AI. Companion encodings or checking targets are not distinct discoveries by themselves.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned metadata and formal statement identify a classical human theorem, known human argument or formalization target. Agent transcription and proof-assistant checking alone do not establish a new central AI mathematical contribution under the current policy. This is an eligibility decision on the reviewed formalization, not a negative judgment of the original mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-21 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-21T07:53:19.130Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewREADME explicitly says the new n=4 release changes toolchain and verification interface, not the paper’s mathematical claim. Compare its exact certificate/statement with any existing paper assessment before making a verification amendment; do not treat the new registry version as a new discovery.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned AI disclosure says the mathematics, statements and paper are the human author’s; Claude drafted and repaired Lean code against the supplied proof. This is formalization assistance under the current contribution policy.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewThe pinned disclosure documents agents formalizing specified existing manuscript results. Establish the particular original mathematical argument supplied by AI, separately from implementation, fidelity changes and manuscript authorship, before inclusion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
