Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewThe pinned disclosure documents agents formalizing specified existing manuscript results. Establish the particular original mathematical argument supplied by AI, separately from implementation, fidelity changes and manuscript authorship, before inclusion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewAristotle produced an entropy-only formal proof with author feedback; later Codex work ports/checks the package. Determine whether the retained proof supplies an original central AI argument rather than formalizing the human source; keep the entropy-only statement separate from the full variational problem.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewAI-origin maximum inverse estimate and optimal digit-window extensions are explicitly disclosed. Exact contract read; a distinct publishable scope still needs comparison with the ordinary-convergent prior bounds and fixed-word versus variable-index sharpness conventions. Agent reviews and finite exact replays are not outside human assessments.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedReviewed scope formalizes named existing human theorems or author-supplied normalizer results. Pinned manifest/statement and project account do not establish a specific new central-AI mathematical contribution; formalization effort and new registry version alone do not qualify. Preserve the original results and dates as background.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewThe pinned disclosure documents agents formalizing specified existing manuscript results. Establish the particular original mathematical argument supplied by AI, separately from implementation, fidelity changes and manuscript authorship, before inclusion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewPinned project and exact formal contract reviewed. AI assistance in proofs, certificates or packaging is documented, but a contribution-specific central mathematical idea and its human-origin baseline are not yet reconciled. Existing human results and source hypotheses remain separate; no automatic registry promotion.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-20 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-20T07:30:08.090Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: the exact all-scale db2 norm formula and optimal uniform constant go beyond the historical finite-scale manuscript, but priority is explicitly unresolved and the allocation of the retained sign/recurrence argument between human inputs and agents needs reconciliation. Check source-bound verification dates separately from registration.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: the strict bf>e(e+d) survival/transience theorem and arbitrary finite immigrant contents are explicit, but the disclosure documents AI formalization and manuscript preparation without identifying the retained central AI mathematical idea. Exact CTMC/physical-time construction reviewed; significance or formal checking cannot replace attribution.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: revised stochastic controllability theorem, ordinary progressive finite-energy controls, Brownian filtration and inherited dependencies require exact manuscript/revision comparison. AI proof-development assistance is disclosed, but central new mathematical work versus formalizing the authors’ revised argument remains unresolved.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: Claude is explicitly credited with the new solid-grid path algorithm. The registered theorem checks algorithm correctness; polynomial running time uses a separate hand-reviewed cost model, and equivalence of king-move escape solidity with the conventional face definition is tested but not proved. Resolve that mathematical scope before presenting a standard-model polynomial algorithm.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: the 4/3 all-genus limit-inferior systole bound and exact supremum semantics are stated, but the human-directed goal and agent Lean work do not allocate the central arithmetic/gluing advance. Compare the mathematical origin and prior all-genus result before eligibility.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: the source credits an AI-developed proof adapted from a recent human preprint. Compare the p,q endpoint hypotheses and retained new argument with that preprint, rather than treating a formal proof or changed port as a distinct discovery.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: lossy path-distance tomography reports mean/covariance reconstruction. Resolve exact identifiable model, noise/loss assumptions, prior moment-based recovery and central AI role before a distinct contribution.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: compare the radian nine-gon algebraicity equivalence with retained OpenAI Euclidean Ramsey results and its exact angle/ambient-space hypotheses; identify a new retained AI argument rather than another registry identity.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: compare minimal Padovan settling-clock/chirality classification with the earlier Coxeter/Padovan and substitution artifacts. The two minimal rules and alphabet/model restrictions need a contribution-specific priority and AI-origin decision.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHuman LEAPS mathematics and hand-scaffolded proofs are distinguished from AI helper modules. The disclosed classical Pontryagin step and supplied-proof formalization do not establish central AI work on the main delta-star theorem. Hold any separately claimed new uniform-topology method for exact attribution.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedPinned primary statement and AI disclosure describe formalization of existing human mathematics or an existing supplied proof plan. No separately scoped central AI mathematical contribution is established; proof-assistant use and registry admission alone do not qualify. This is a contribution eligibility decision, not a finding that checking failed.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold: the source explicitly attributes the informal planar Pólya–Szegő proof to Tang and Zhang with ChatGPT assistance, followed by AI formalization. No specific retained central AI idea is allocated. The finite-area domain/equality scope is recorded without inferring that a formalization qualifies.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
Awaiting detailed reviewHold/link review: implements known Erdős 684 bounds from APSSV26 with weaker elementary constants 514 and 1/8. Preserve the original OpenAI contribution and stronger human follow-up; determine whether removing PNT adds a distinct central AI mathematical advance rather than duplicating the result.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-19 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-19T07:23:14.226Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedClassical chordal, split, threshold and cograph results. Pinned entry, disclosure and repository describe formalization of known human mathematics. No separate central AI mathematical contribution established; AI use and checking do not by themselves qualify.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedKnown Tutte f-factor theorem formalized. Exact source and AI disclosure reviewed; no qualifying central AI discovery or new mathematical method established beyond formalizing the existing human proof.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedThe additive refutation and primorial strategy are expressly attributed to an earlier public proof. Codex generated an independent Lean implementation and audit, while the disclosure disclaims mathematical novelty.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedClassical graph removal lemma and associated known proof plan. Pinned source reviewed; no new central AI mathematical contribution identified beyond formalization of known human work.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedKnown Chvátal/Pósa Hamiltonicity criteria. Source documents AI formalization, but no specific qualifying central AI contribution beyond existing human mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedKnown Hewitt–Marczewski–Pondiczery countable-density theorem formalized. No new central AI mathematical argument established beyond the existing human proof.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedClassical Moore-graph and Hoffman–Singleton results. Registry checking and agent formalization do not establish a separate qualifying central AI discovery.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
On hold after reviewThe source does not distinguish AI-origin reduction steps from Rudolph’s mathematical work.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedHuang quadratic-form numerical-semigroup content and approach were supplied by the human; agents wrote Lean and prose. Under current eligibility, this does not establish central AI mathematics.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedKnown countable-coordinate factorization for compact products. No new central AI contribution established beyond formalizing a supplied human result and proof approach.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
ExcludedChanged Lacey–Thiele Carleson artifact formalizes known human mathematics. Source/version comparison does not identify a separate qualifying central AI result; no automatic restoration of an excluded formalization.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T07:37:42.537Z
Palomar formal checking registry
On hold after reviewThe Coxeter growth formula and plastic-number identities are developed with AI proof drafting, but the author fixed the statement and normal-form design. The source does not identify a distinct retained AI mathematical idea beyond formalization of related classical identities.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z
Palomar formal checking registry
On hold after reviewThe source does not establish novelty against earlier equality-case classifications and explicitly withholds a novelty claim.
Screening recorded: 2026-10-18 · Decision reviewed: 2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z
