Lean-verified lower bounds for the Shannon capacity of odd cycles

Pjotr Buys, Sven Polak, Jeroen Zuiddam

Buys, Polak and Zuiddam give Lean-formalized Shannon-capacity lower bounds for C7, C11, C13, C15, C19, C21 and C23 using seven explicit base tuples and Gao’s product lemma. Their C7 bound is 3.258805369885… and their C11 bound is 5.294502522149….

Sources for this record

What was already known

Exact odd-cycle capacities beyond C5 remain unknown. Earlier model-generated independent sets improved four cycles, and Gao’s human product method gave C7 ≥ 3.258789153908.

AI involvement AI-centered

ChatGPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Claude Opus 5 assisted the finite search; earlier model-generated sets fed part of it. Buys, Polak and Zuiddam supplied the product argument and Lean formalization.

Documented model-generated base independent sets and BPZ model-assisted tuple search supplied central retained finite constructions; human work supplied Gao-style propagation and formalization.

Importance Modest

Adds seven formally checked lower-bound constructions across small odd cycles.

Limitations

The gains are small and no capacity is determined. A later independent-set construction already exceeds the C11 figure, and later heterogeneous recursion exceeds the C7 figure. The origin of each of the seven base tuples is not individually documented.

Technical verification Formal (Lean + human)

BPZ report Lean checks of all seven explicit base tuples and formalization of their stated lower bounds. Itty et al. separately report author checks of feasibility for their four earlier model-generated sets; that human check has narrower scope. These are source-reported checks, not AIProofWatch reruns.

Formal checking

Lean formal proof over explicit finite literals

Checker
Lean kernel via spectra-research/shannon-capacity-lean
Scope
Seven valid base tuples, product derivation and the paper’s seven capacity lower bounds
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Formal checking

author verification of graph independence for the returned sets

Checker
Itty, Rosin, Carstensen and Reichman
Scope
Feasibility of their four earlier independent-set constructions in C7^10, C11^6, C13^6 and C15^8
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Full

The human authors explain the valid-tuple conditions, Gao product iteration and each derived bound; the model search heuristic itself need not be fully understood to explain the constructions.

Correction and publication history