A Four-Terminal Planar Lower Bound and a Sharp Equal-Cost Gadget for Cost-Preserving Unsplittable-Flow Rounding

Matthew Protti

Protti’s planar acyclic four-terminal instance needs upper overload at least 335 when the largest demand is 294 if cost cannot increase. A rational family gives a lower bound (299−41√41)/32≈1.139747 for the unrestricted planar constant.

Sources for this record

What was already known

The cost-preserving unsplittable-flow question remained open in this planar setting, though Rybin had announced a different counterexample shortly before this work.

AI involvement AI-led

GPT-5.6 Pro carried out most construction search, symbolic derivation and verifier work. Matthew Protti chose the target, directed the work and corrected a cost-normalization error.

GPT-5.6 Pro reportedly performed most active construction and proof work within a human-directed research loop.

Importance Notable

The example gives a small planar witness and a stronger lower bound for this rounding problem.

Limitations

The value is sharp only in Protti’s fixed-topology, equal-full-cost, two-cheap-choice model. The release does not prove global planar optimality or priority over unindexed work.

Technical verification Partial

Independent checking

exhaustive exact computation and symbolic identity checks

Checker
v0.1.0 exact-arithmetic verifier and separate Codex reimplementation
Scope
The 335/294 instance, all 16 routings and 13 arcs; symbolic checks of the family and restricted identities
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Human understanding Full

Protti describes the construction, caught a normalization error and explains the claim boundaries and mechanism.

Correction and publication history

2026-10-18 · publication

The example gives a small planar witness and a stronger lower bound for this rounding problem.

Read this published revision