AI-contributed lemmas help prove square-grid tree maximality

For every n>0 and every set of n² lattice points, the induced square-grid graph has at most as many spanning trees as the n×n square. Equality holds exactly for translates of that square.

Sources for this record

What was already known

Procaccia and Tucker-Foltz posed square maximality. Zhang had proved a rectangular balancing theorem; a grid-graph estimate by Tapp is another input.

AI involvement AI-centered

Jiechen Zhang directed the proof and supplied earlier results. GPT-5.6 Sol contributed the rectangular area penalty and normalized-hull lemmas; Sloan Nietert helped design the breakthrough prompt. Zhang reports checking the mathematics and formal-statement alignment.

The model supplied the retained area-penalty and hull lemmas central to the proof, while Zhang led and checked the overall result.

Importance Notable

Resolves the square-grid spanning-tree conjecture with its equality case.

Limitations

The reported formal check covers the inequality and equality characterization. The argument uses earlier human results. The broader arbitrary-spanning-subgraph strengthening is a separate formal statement.

Technical verification Formal (Lean 4.32.0 kernel, Comparator and NanoDa + human)

The cited record reports sorry-free Lean proofs with standard axioms and Comparator/NanoDa checking of both headline statements. Zhang explicitly checked the mathematical argument and performed a detailed source-to-Lean specification audit. These are distinct machine and human methods, reported by the source rather than reproduced here.

Independent checking

Sorry-free kernel proof, standard-axiom audit and independent statement/proof replay

Checker
Lean kernel, Comparator and NanoDa in Zhang's pinned repository
Scope
SquareMaximalityPalomar.squareMaximality and equality_iff_latticeSquare
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Independent checking

Checked definitions, hypotheses, intermediate arguments, cited results and conclusions; completed specification audit on 22 August 2026

Checker
Jiechen Zhang
Scope
Square-maximality inequality, equality case and paper-to-Lean correspondence
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Human understanding Few

Default for missing evidence of human explanation: Zhang checked the argument and source alignment, but this documented check does not itself establish that a person can explain the model-supplied area-penalty and normalized-hull mechanism.

Correction and publication history