What was already known
The cases n=2 and n=3 were classical. Pang's 2026 preprint proved n at least 17 and left n=4 through 16 open. The earlier boundary-exclusion framework bounded row and column deficits separately and did not reach n=16.
AI involvement
Kafidov credits GPT-5.6 Sol with the strategy, joint-deficit lemma and most proof text. He chose the problem, directed revisions and submitted the paper; a completed independent check is not reported.
The model is credited with the central lemma and proof strategy, while a human directed the problem and final manuscript.
Importance
Adds dimension 16 through a new joint-deficit scaling argument.
Limitations
The proof covers n=16. Together with Pang's prior n≥17 result it covers n≥16, but dimensions 4 through 15 remain outside this result. A completed check of the submitted proof is not documented.
Technical verification
The manuscript gives a full argument but expressly says its AI disclosure is no substitute for independent expert mathematical review. No completed check is documented.
Human understanding
The manuscript explains the joint budget algebra, but most original proof text was model-produced and the author does not document his own explanation of the central reasoning. Few is the evidence-gap default, not a claim that he lacks understanding.
Correction and publication history
Adds dimension 16 through a new joint-deficit scaling argument.
Read this published revision