What was already known
The 2019 analysis obtained O(1/t^(2−2p)) for 1/2<p<1 and left the O(1/t) boundary open under these assumptions.
AI involvement
The paper and Surina credit AlphaProof Nexus with discovering the schedule and proof. Human authors present the discrete argument; Gemini assisted informalization.
The original paper and Surina's first-person account say the agent discovered the new schedule and proof, with no human-supplied mathematical step beyond setting the task documented.
Importance
Closes that rate gap for anchored GDA.
Limitations
A later Lean theorem proves the asymptotic O(1/t) rate with an unspecified constant and explicit slack. It does not certify the paper’s sharper displayed constant; no complete human proof check is documented.
Technical verification
The later public AlphaProof Nexus Lean file supplies a proof without sorry of an existential O(1/t) constant under explicit monotonicity, Lipschitz, differentiability and saddle-point hypotheses. Its C includes slack +100, so it certifies the asymptotic rate, not the paper's displayed exact constant. The paper's earlier link points to an older Ryu-paper PR and is not itself the evidence used here. No local Lean rebuild was performed.
Formal checking
Under stated monotone Lipschitz saddle-point assumptions and the agent's schedule, there exists C>0 with squared last-iterate gradient norm at most C/T for every T>=1; Proof term last_iterate_convergence in APNOutputs/AICollaborator/Optimization/LastIterateConvergence.lean, with no sorry in that file
- Checker
- Lean 4 kernel, reported by the Google DeepMind AlphaProof Nexus authors
- Scope
- Under stated monotone Lipschitz saddle-point assumptions and the agent's schedule, there exists C>0 with squared last-iterate gradient norm at most C/T for every T>=1
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.
Human understanding
Surina and coauthors' natural-language proof explains bounded iterates, the recurrence for consecutive differences and the final residual bound.
Correction and publication history
Closes that rate gap for anchored GDA.
Read this published revision