A revision of Litvak's conjecture on Gaussian minima and a volumetric zone conjecture

Dmitriy Kunisky

For n=4 and p=2, the AlphaEvolve-found cosine correlation matrix Σᵢⱼ=cos(π(i−j)/n) has a strictly smaller expected squared minimum absolute Gaussian coordinate than the regular-simplex correlation matrix.

Sources for this record

What was already known

Litvak conjectured the regular-simplex covariance minimizes this quantity for every n≥3 and p>0. Earlier comparisons with identity covariance did not settle that claim.

AI involvement AI-centered

AlphaEvolve found the cosine covariance in a search designed by Dmitriy Kunisky. Kunisky recognized its structure and supplied the analytic law and proof; GPT-5.5 Pro’s proposed proofs of a broader conjecture were incorrect.

AlphaEvolve supplied the decisive counterexample candidate within a human-selected optimization objective; Kunisky supplied the mathematical analysis and proof.

Importance Notable

Gives a rigorous four-variable counterexample to the universal conjecture.

Limitations

The proposed optimality of cosine matrices for all n and p and the related volumetric-zone claim remain conjectures. Kunisky proved this specific comparison after the search found the candidate.

Technical verification Formal (human)

Kunisky's Theorem 2.2 gives a rigorous human proof of the exact n=4,p=2 inequality for the AI-found matrix, replacing the initial numerical search with explicit analytic bounds.

Formal checking

analytic calculation and rigorous bounded comparison in Theorem 2.2

Checker
Dmitriy Kunisky (author)
Scope
At n=4,p=2, the AlphaEvolve-found cosine covariance has smaller expected squared Gaussian minimum than the regular-simplex covariance
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Full

Kunisky explains the rank-two regular-polygon representation, derives the candidate's law and expectation, and isolates the exact inequality that refutes the conjecture.

Correction and publication history