What was already known
Earlier differentiation and coefficient-counting methods did not give these permanent-specific formula bounds. A formula is a tree, so these are not general circuit bounds.
AI involvement
OpenAI attributes the argument and Lean formalization to Astra. Humans selected the problem and prepared the manuscript with the model.
OpenAI’s original disclosure assigns the argument and subsequent Lean formalization to Astra; human manuscript preparation is separately credited.
- Supporting source (github.com) — PermanentFormulaLowerBound.permanent_rational_formula_logarithmic_lower_bound
Importance
Improves permanent-specific arithmetic formula lower bounds.
Limitations
The reported main Lean target certifies the rational-formula bound; division-free formula and circuit claims have separate declarations. Human reviews discuss proof structure and parameters without a complete independent reconstruction.
Technical verification
The project reports a complete Lean certificate for the stated formal theorem. Human assessments have narrower scope; semantic matching and any manuscript gaps remain separately noted.
Independent checking
chapter-specific mathematical review of the published argument, with the limited coverage summarized in the audit. Table 1; Chapter 5 discussion
- Checker
- Chapter 5 human reviewers in the Sienicki et al. review corpus
- Scope
- permanent lower-bound proof structure and parameters
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Formal checking
Lean 4.32.0 formal certificate in Permanent.lean; comparator target for PermanentFormulaLowerBound.permanent_rational_formula_logarithmic_lower_bound; manifest reports zero sorry and only standard axioms. main_results entry PermanentFormulaLowerBound.permanent_rational_formula_logarithmic_lower_bound; status and axioms
- Checker
- OpenAI ten-proofs project, Lean kernel and Comparator configuration
- Scope
- valid rational formula lower bound n^4/(192 log_2 n) for n≥32
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.
Human understanding
Three human assessments examine the permanent-specific construction, lower-bound parameter choices and formula/circuit distinctions; they request clearer novelty credit rather than identifying a mechanism gap.
Correction and publication history
Improves permanent-specific arithmetic formula lower bounds.
Read this published revision