What was already known
Hamaker and Reiner conjectured that open intervals outside specified parabolic forms are contractible, while the specified intervals have sphere homotopy type.
AI involvement
Defant asked ChatGPT 5.4 Pro to prove the conjecture; it returned the counterexample. Defant incorporated and explained it. His later correction of a model error concerns a different lemma.
The paper's abstract and §7 explicitly say ChatGPT autonomously found the disproof, returning a counterexample when prompted to prove the conjecture.
Importance
The finite interval disproves the published topology conjecture.
Limitations
The paper does not document a separate completed check or executable certificate for the displayed interval. Defant’s later maximal-parabolic identity and shelling results are separate contributions.
Technical verification
The v2 paper displays a finite ASM_6 interval and states its Möbius value, but it does not document a named complete human check or an exact computational certificate for that interval. A displayed example is evidence for the claim, not a documented checking method.
Human understanding
Defant identifies the precise failure: the interval is outside the specified parabolic form but has Möbius value 1, so its open order complex cannot be contractible.
Correction and publication history
If correct, the finite interval disproves the published topology conjecture.
Read this published revision