Completeness of Canonical Closure Representations Is coNP-Complete

Mikhail Babin

Testing whether a supplied family of meet-irreducibles is the complete canonical family of a finite implication closure system is coNP-complete, even with acyclic implications of premise size at most three and a genuine irredundant supplied family. The hard direction reduces 3-UNSAT to a missing member.

Sources for this record

What was already known

Khardon left characteristic-model completeness complexity open in 1995. Recognizing an individual pseudo-intent was already coNP-complete, but completeness of a proposed canonical list had not been classified.

AI involvement AI-led

Mikhail Babin credits GPT-5.6 Pro with the main proof and reduction. Babin checked that proof, wrote the manuscript and explains its reduction mechanism; model autonomy beyond this credit is not established.

The disclosure identifies the model as producer of the main proof, with Babin as checker and author; autonomy is not documented.

Importance Major

Classifies a longstanding completeness problem, with consequences for related Horn, convex-geometry, formal-concept and database formulations.

Limitations

The model-origin proof is the main closure-representation reduction. Cross-field consequences use established correspondences or separate appendix arguments and are not separate model discoveries. The stated output-polynomial barrier is conditional on P≠NP.

Technical verification Formal (human)

Babin expressly reports checking the complete main proof; this is a source-reported human proof check, not a review reproduced here. The transferred consequences are stated separately.

Formal checking

human check of the model-obtained proof

Checker
Mikhail Babin, author
Scope
Main coNP-completeness proof for implication–meet-irreducible equality
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Full

Babin's checked manuscript explains the choice elements, clause gates, auxiliary-cut recurrence and missing meet-irreducible mechanism in §1.4.

Correction and publication history