The Maxwell Conjecture is False

Philip Arathoon, Gavin Ball, Matthew D. Kvalheim

Five positive point charges in R³ can have at least 24 nondegenerate electrostatic equilibria. A small perturbation makes all critical points nondegenerate and finite in number, exceeding Maxwell’s proposed (n−1)² bound of 16 when n=5.

Sources for this record

What was already known

Maxwell’s proposed general upper bound had not been disproved. The maximum for three unequal positive charges remained unresolved.

AI involvement AI-centered

GPT-5.6 Sol suggested adding two small axial charges to three charges on an equilateral triangle. Arathoon, Ball and Kvalheim chose the scaling, proved persistence and transversality, and checked the argument.

The authors explicitly credit the model with the construction idea that yields the counterexample; humans completed the proof.

Importance Major

Disproves a longstanding proposed upper bound for point-charge equilibria.

Limitations

The authors verified the mathematical details; no independent completed check of the full perturbation argument was located. The separate three-charge bound concerns a different problem.

Technical verification Formal (human)

The authors explicitly say they verified the mathematical details of the complete five-charge argument. This is a reported human check, not reproduced here; the described algebra-system use is not a documented exact certificate check.

Independent checking

Verification of mathematical details and author-written proof

Checker
Philip Arathoon, Gavin Ball and Matthew D. Kvalheim, authors
Scope
Five-charge counterexample with at least 24 nondegenerate critical points and Morse perturbation
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Human understanding Full

The authors explain the central bifurcation from one equilibrium to 21 and why the other three persist.

Correction and publication history