OpenAI reports a counterexample to integer-degree harmonic dimension comparison

A complete smooth nonnegatively Ricci-curved metric on Euclidean space in dimension 16 has more harmonic functions of pointwise polynomial growth at most integer degree 50000 than Euclidean space has harmonic polynomials of that degree.

Sources for this record

What was already known

The sharp degree-one bound and finite dimensionality for every fixed growth degree were known. Real noninteger-degree counterexamples did not settle the integer-degree Euclidean comparison posed by Yau.

AI involvement AI-led

OpenAI credits itself as manuscript author and states that its internal frontier model produced the results in this release. Individual human input is not detailed enough to establish task-only autonomy.

OpenAI is named as author on the manuscript, and its release attributes the results to an internal frontier model. The individual human input is not detailed enough to establish autonomy.

Importance Notable

Disproves the integer-degree form of Yau’s harmonic-dimension comparison question.

Limitations

The formalized witness uses dimension 16 and degree 50000, is Euclidean near the origin, and has asymptotic volume ratio strictly between zero and one.

Technical verification Formal (Lean 4)

OpenAI reports a Lean proof matching the selected claim.

Formal checking

The pinned Lean note constructs the dimension-16 degree-50000 witness and proves its harmonic-function space exceeds the Euclidean count.

Checker
OpenAI-reported Lean 4 / Comparator
Scope
A complete smooth nonnegatively Ricci-curved metric on Euclidean space in dimension 16 has more harmonic functions of pointwise polynomial growth at most integer degree 50000 than Euclidean space has harmonic polynomials of that degree.
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Few

Few is the default when evidence for a higher level is insufficient. No named person is documented as explaining the central argument for this assessed contribution.

Correction and publication history

2026-10-18 · publication

Primary manuscript, attribution, prior-work, and scoped checking review for non-notifying local inclusion.

Read this published revision