OpenAI reports a memory–sample lower bound for noiseless Gaussian regression

For every fixed A>0 and sufficiently large dimension d, a one-pass learner retaining at most Ad² bits between independent exact Gaussian linear measurements needs at least c_A d log(1/ε) measurements to estimate a uniformly random unit vector to angular error ε≤1/10 with success probability at least 2/3.

Sources for this record

What was already known

With all equations retained, d independent Gaussian measurements identify the vector almost surely. The manuscript quantifies the extra precision-dependent sample cost when only a finite memory state persists between fresh observations.

AI involvement AI-led

OpenAI credits itself as manuscript author and states that its internal frontier model produced the results in this release. Individual human input is not detailed enough to establish task-only autonomy.

OpenAI is named as author on the manuscript, and its release attributes the results to an internal frontier model. The individual human input is not detailed enough to establish autonomy.

Importance Notable

Establishes a precision-driven sample lower bound even though every observation is noiseless.

Limitations

The bound averages success over a uniform spherical signal prior; measurements are fresh independent Gaussian rows, not chosen or revisited by the learner. The constant depends on fixed A.

Technical verification Formal (Lean 4)

OpenAI reports a Lean proof matching the selected claim.

Formal checking

The pinned OpenAI Lean scope note identifies this selected claim.

Checker
OpenAI-reported Lean 4 / Comparator
Scope
For every fixed A>0 and sufficiently large dimension d, a one-pass learner retaining at most Ad² bits between independent exact Gaussian linear measurements needs at least c_A d log(1/ε) measurements to estimate a uniformly random unit vector to angular error ε≤1/10 with success probability at least 2/3.
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Few

Few is the default when evidence for a higher level is insufficient. No named person is documented as explaining the central argument for this assessed contribution.

Correction and publication history

2026-10-18 · publication

Primary manuscript, attribution, prior-work, and scoped checking review for non-notifying local inclusion.

Read this published revision