What was already known
Brezis asked for these endpoint constants. Earlier estimates, including Nguyen’s fixed-threshold result and a fractional-degree inequality, did not give the stated degeneracy.
AI involvement
Dou and Jin explicitly say Rethlas generated the proofs of both theorems. The retained power trick uses weighted averages of f^k for the p−1 result and one power n≈δ^(−1) for the threshold result.
Rethlas is directly credited with both retained proofs; the human authors supplied the problem setting, verification and exposition.
Importance
Answers Brezis Problems 5.1 and 5.3 in the circle setting.
Limitations
The two human authors checked the model-generated proofs; the claim does not extend beyond the stated map and parameter assumptions.
Technical verification
Both authors expressly report checking and verifying the proofs of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4. This is a source-reported complete human proof check, not a machine formalization or AIProofWatch rerun.
Formal checking
Checked and verified the Rethlas-generated proofs
- Checker
- Xu'an Dou and Zeyu Jin, authors
- Scope
- Theorem 1.3's p−1 constant and Theorem 1.4's δ constant
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.
Human understanding
The authors explain both power-trick mechanisms and present elementary estimates realizing the two degenerating constants.
Correction and publication history
Answers Brezis Problems 5.1 and 5.3 in the circle setting.
Read this published revision