Field independence of algebra and module amenability
Follow the latest progress by email.
Does amenability depend on the ground field? More precisely, for a field extension K⊂L, an associative L-algebra A and an A-module M, is amenability over A viewed as a K-algebra equivalent to amenability over L?
Why it matters and what counts as progress
Why it matters: The ground-field question asks whether amenability is intrinsic to an algebra or module rather than dependent on its scalar description.
What counts as progress: Prove field independence for arbitrary associative algebras and modules, or exhibit an extension where amenability changes.
How the problem developed
- 2018 · Open question [1]
Yves Cornulier Raised whether algebraic amenability can depend on the base field, motivating the field-extension question for algebras and modules.
- 8 Aug 2026 · Field invariance result [2]
Be’eri Greenfeld; ChatGPT 5.6 Sol contributed significant proof ideas, and Greenfeld wrote and checked the paper Proved that the paper’s algebra- and module-amenability notions are invariant under extension of the ground field.
AI contribution
Amenability is not sensitive to the base field
For any field extension K⊂L, associative L-algebra A and A-module M, Greenfeld’s manuscript states that amenability of M over A viewed as a K-algebra is equivalent to amenability over L. This also applies to amenable and fully amenable algebras.
Sources
Website timeline
Publication dates and editorial changes.
ChatGPT-assisted proof makes algebra amenability field-independent