For zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick heat-bath dynamics at β=1, stationary and fair-spin quench autocorrelations converge jointly as random functions after multiplying correlations by n^{1/3} and scaling waiting times and lags by n^{2/3}; Gaussian and Rademacher couplings have the same limiting law, and the quench limit relaxes to the stationary limit as waiting time grows.
For zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick heat-bath dynamics at β=1, stationary and fair-spin quench autocorrelations converge jointly as random functions after multiplying correlations by n^{1/3} and scaling waiting times and lags by n^{2/3}; Gaussian and Rademacher couplings have the same limiting law, and the quench limit relaxes to the stationary limit as waiting time grows.
For zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick heat-bath dynamics at β=1, stationary and fair-spin quench autocorrelations converge jointly as random functions after multiplying correlations by n^{1/3} and scaling waiting times and lags by n^{2/3}; Gaussian and Rademacher couplings have the same limiting law, and the quench limit relaxes to the stationary limit as waiting time grows.
If correct, identifies a common random finite-size critical relaxation process for two coupling laws.
Do critical SK quench autocorrelations have the same scaled random limit for Gaussian and Rademacher couplings?
Publication dates and editorial changes.
OpenAI reports universal critical SK quench autocorrelation limits
Allow optional Google Analytics to help improve AIProofWatch? Privacy details.
