Language-model proof of the Daykin–Frankl conjecture
- Mathematics
For every convex P in the Boolean lattice Q_n and all k≥0, w(P×Q_k)≥w(Q_{n+k})|P|/2^n. The k=0 case proves the Daykin–Frankl relative-width conjecture.
For every convex subset P of the n-dimensional Boolean lattice, its largest antichain occupies at least the same fraction of P as the central layer occupies of the full lattice.
For every convex P in the Boolean lattice Q_n and all k≥0, w(P×Q_k)≥w(Q_{n+k})|P|/2^n. The k=0 case proves the Daykin–Frankl relative-width conjecture.
For every convex subset P of the n-dimensional Boolean lattice, its largest antichain occupies at least the same fraction of P as the central layer occupies of the full lattice.
The conjecture asks whether convexity preserves a universal lower bound on the relative width of a Boolean-lattice subset.
Does every convex P in Q_n satisfy w(P)/|P| ≥ binom(n, floor(n/2))/2^n?
Publication dates and editorial changes.
Allow optional Google Analytics to help improve AIProofWatch? Privacy details.