Stanley’s rational-factor question for differential posets

For a locally finite differential poset P, must its multichain generating function M_(P,k)(q) differ from F_P(q)^k by a rational factor? The proposed failure already concerns 1-differential posets and k=2.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: A nonrational quotient would show that multichain enumeration in differential posets need not have the proposed finite rational correction.

What counts as progress: Prove rationality under additional structure or construct a poset with a demonstrably nonrational quotient over characteristic-zero fields.

How the problem developed

  1. 1988 · Open question [1]

    Richard P. Stanley Asked whether each k-multichain generating series of a differential poset is a rational multiple of the kth power of its rank-generating series.

  2. 28 Jul 2026 · Counterexample [2]

    Dai and coauthors Constructed a locally finite 1-differential poset for which the two-multichain quotient is nonrational over every characteristic-zero field.

AI contribution

A Negative Answer to Stanley's Problem 4 on Differential Posets

Xinan Dai, Wenhao Deng, Yingdong Shi, Tailin Wu, Yuchen Yang

Dai and coauthors construct a locally finite 1-differential poset P for which the two-multichain quotient M_(P,2)(q)/F_P(q)² is nonrational over every characteristic-zero field. This refutes Stanley’s proposed rational-factor property already at k=2.

AI involvementAI-autonomous
ImportanceNotable
Technical verificationFormal (human)
Human understandingFull
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Stanley, Differential posets
  2. Dai et al., A negative answer to Stanley’s Problem 4 on differential posets
  3. Dai and coauthors’ differential-poset paper
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.