Edge additions for diameter four in triangle-free graphs

How many edges must be added to a connected triangle-free n-vertex graph to make its diameter at most four while preserving triangle-freeness? Can one always save a fixed linear fraction below n added edges?

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: Graphs needing n−o(n) added edges would rule out every proposed fixed linear saving in this diameter-four completion problem.

What counts as progress: Prove a uniform saving or build graphs needing n−o(n) additions, with sharper quantitative error bounds.

How the problem developed

  1. 1998 · Open problem [1][2]

    Paul Erdős, András Gyárfás, and Miklós Ruszinkó Asked whether every connected triangle-free n-vertex graph can be made diameter at most four by adding at most (1−ε)n edges while retaining triangle-freeness; proved bounds for target diameters three and five.

  2. 9 Jun 2026 · Counterexample claim [2][3]

    Claude Fable 5, prompted by Nick Kuhn A construction reported on the problem thread gives connected triangle-free graphs requiring n−O(n^{8/9}(log n)^{2/9}) edge additions for diameter at most four; a Lean formalization is linked.

AI contribution

Claude counterexample refutes Erdős #619 diameter-four saving

For every η>0, a family of connected triangle-free graphs needs at least (1−η)n new edges to become diameter at most four while staying triangle-free. The problem record states the stronger quantitative bound h₄(G)≥n−O(n^(8/9)(log n)^(2/9)).

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceNotable
Human understandingFew
Reported

Sources

  1. Erdős, Gyárfás, and Ruszinkó, How to decrease the diameter of triangle-free graphs
  2. Erdős 619 discussion and accepted counterexample
  3. Kuhn, Erdős 619 construction and provenance
  4. Kuhn, Erdős 619 verification log
  5. Formal Conjectures, Erdős 619 statement
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.