Robustness of the four-row permanent inequality

How robust is the four-row permanent inequality when the probability law on the 24 permutations departs from uniform? For balanced laws at total-variation distance r≤1/24 and nonnegative rows with uniform mean square one, the target deficit coefficient is (1−24r)/9 times the sum of row variances.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: Sharp robustness constants identify precisely how nonuniform permutation laws affect the four-row inequality and where it can fail.

What counts as progress: Prove the sharp variance coefficient at each radius, characterize equality and determine the exact admissible radius.

How the problem developed

  1. 4 Aug 2005 · Theorem [1]

    Eric Carlen, Elliott Lieb and Michael Loss Established a permanent inequality for four nonnegative functions under the uniform law on permutations, providing a baseline for later robustness questions.

  2. 13 Sept 2021 · Theorem [2]

    Laura Bristiel and Clément Caputo Proved uniform-law permanent inequalities for all exponents in a broad function-space setting.

  3. 8 Oct 2026 · Sharp inequality [3]

    JD Jones For balanced laws on S₄ within total-variation distance r≤1/24 of uniform, proved the sharp stability coefficient (1−24r)/9 for normalized nonnegative rows.

AI contribution

GPT-assisted proof finds the sharp robustness radius for a four-row permanent inequality

For a balanced probability law ν on the 24 permutations of four labels at total-variation distance at most r≤1/24 from uniform, and nonnegative rows fᵢ normalized by the uniform mean of fᵢ² equal to one, 1−Eν∏ᵢfᵢ(σ(i))≥(1−24r)/9 ΣᵢVar(fᵢ). The coefficient is sharp at each radius and 1/24 is the exact admissible radius.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceNotable
Human understandingFew
Reported

Sources

  1. Carlen, Lieb and Loss, An inequality of Hadamard type for permanents
  2. Bristiel and Caputo, On the permanent of random matrices
  3. Result and scope
  4. Completed Lean proof
  5. Proof checking record
  6. Provenance and prior work
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.