Sharp comparison exponents for Hilbert-transform and UMD constants

At p=2, how sharply can a Banach space’s Hilbert-transform and UMD constants differ? The target tests whether both classical quadratic comparison exponents are optimal, over real and complex spaces, using 2ⁿ-dimensional families.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: It measures the quantitative difference between two equivalent analytic properties, rather than their already known qualitative equivalence.

What counts as progress: Construct spaces attaining either quadratic comparison, or establish a smaller uniform exponent; both directions require separate treatment.

How the problem developed

  1. 9 Sept 2026 · Sharpness result [1]

    Emiel Lorist and Jan van Neerven Constructed two explicit 2ⁿ-dimensional Banach-space families showing that both quadratic comparisons between the Hilbert-transform and UMD constants are sharp.

AI contribution

The bounds ℏₚ,ₓ ≲ βₚ,ₓ² and βₚ,ₓ ≲ ℏₚ,ₓ² are sharp

Emiel Lorist, Jan van Neerven

Lorist and van Neerven construct two explicit 2^n-dimensional Banach-space families at p=2. One has Hilbert-transform constant of order n and UMD constant of order √n; the other reverses them, making both classical quadratic comparison exponents sharp over real and complex spaces.

AI involvementAI-centered
ImportanceMajor
Human understandingFull
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Emiel Lorist and Jan van Neerven, The bounds ℏₚ,ₓ≲(βₚ,ₓ)² and βₚ,ₓ≲(ℏₚ,ₓ)² are sharp
  2. Lorist and van Neerven, The Hilbert transform–UMD dependence problem
  3. Proof repository
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.