IMO 2002 Problem 2b: Euclidean-geometry translation

Let O be the midpoint of BC and let A lie on the circle with center O through B. Choose D on that circle with DA=DB. Let E and F be its intersections with the perpendicular bisector of OA, and let J be the intersection of AC with the line through O parallel to AD. Prove ∠(CE,CJ)=∠(CJ,CF), using directed line angles.

This page concerns the specialized translated task used in the IMO-AG-30 benchmark. The study’s aggregate result does not establish whether this individual task was solved.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: The task isolates the second angle relation rather than treating the pair of translated targets as one solved item.

What counts as progress: A proof of the C-centered angle identity with all circle, equal-distance and parallel-line conditions retained.

How the problem developed

  1. 2002 · Contest problem [2][1]

    International Mathematical Olympiad Published the original IMO 2002 Problem 2b geometry problem at the annual contest. The AG30 file later gives its specialized translated statement.

  2. 17 Jan 2024 · Benchmark inclusion [2][3]

    Trieu H. Trinh and coauthors Included a translated version in the 30-problem AlphaGeometry benchmark; the study reports 25/30 solved overall, which does not identify this task’s individual result.

  3. 2025 · Problem level benchmark [4]

    Yuri Chervonyi and coauthors Figure 8 of the AlphaGeometry 2 study lists the original IMO 2002 Problem 2b as the chart groups Problem 2; it does not distinguish 2b; for Problem 2, the chart does not separate the translated 2a and 2b tasks.

AI contribution

AlphaGeometry solves 25 translated Olympiad geometry problems

AlphaGeometry solved 25/30 specialized IMO-AG-30 classical Euclidean geometry translations using learned auxiliary-point constructions plus a symbolic deduction and algebra engine; the paper does not claim all natural-language IMO geometry conditions are represented.

AI involvementAI-centered
ImportanceNotable
Human understandingFull
Reported

Sources

  1. IMO 2002 official problem statement booklet
  2. Google DeepMind, AlphaGeometry 30 translated problem statements
  3. AlphaGeometry study and benchmark results
  4. Chervonyi et al., Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2
  5. Trinh and collaborators: Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
  6. AlphaGeometry source and proof artifacts
  7. DeepMind account of computer checking
  8. Precise translated question and assumptions
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.