IMO 2009 Problem 2: Euclidean-geometry translation

Start with triangle MLK and its circumcircle with center W. Take Q on the tangent at M; let P be the reflection of Q in M, B the reflection of P in K and C the reflection of Q in L. Put A=BQ∩CP and let O be the circumcenter of ABC. Prove OP=OQ.

This page concerns the specialized translated task used in the IMO-AG-30 benchmark. The study’s aggregate result does not establish whether this individual task was solved.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: The target turns point reflections and a tangent condition into equal distances from a new circumcenter.

What counts as progress: An exact proof of OP=OQ for the translated construction, with the tangent and reflection assumptions intact.

How the problem developed

  1. 2009 · Contest appearance [1][3]

    International Mathematical Olympiad The official archive lists this as IMO 2009 P2; it is one of the contest problems later encoded in the specialized IMO-AG-30 geometry language.

  2. 17 Jan 2024 · Benchmark result [2][3]

    Trieu H. Trinh, Yuhuai Wu, Quoc V. Le, He He, and Thang Luong (AlphaGeometry) The Nature paper reports AlphaGeometry solved this translated benchmark statement using language-model auxiliary constructions and symbolic deduction/algebra. The paper includes the benchmark proof in its supplement.

  3. 5 Feb 2025 · Benchmark result [4][5][3]

    Yuri Chervonyi, Trieu H. Trinh, Miroslav Olšák, Xiaomeng Yang, Hoang H. Nguyen, Marcelo Menegali, Junehyuk Jung, Junsu Kim, Vikas Verma, Quoc V. Le, and Thang Luong (AlphaGeometry2) The AlphaGeometry2 paper reports solving all 30 statements in the original IMO-AG-30 benchmark, which includes this formalized target. This is a system result on the benchmark encoding, not an independent review of the original contest wording.

AI contribution

AlphaGeometry solves 25 translated Olympiad geometry problems

AlphaGeometry solved 25/30 specialized IMO-AG-30 classical Euclidean geometry translations using learned auxiliary-point constructions plus a symbolic deduction and algebra engine; the paper does not claim all natural-language IMO geometry conditions are represented.

AI involvementAI-centered
ImportanceNotable
Human understandingFull
Reported

Sources

  1. IMO 2009 Problems (official archive)
  2. Trinh et al., Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
  3. AlphaGeometry IMO-AG-30 formalized problem set
  4. Chervonyi et al., Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2
  5. AlphaGeometry2 paper, arXiv record
  6. Trinh and collaborators: Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
  7. AlphaGeometry source and proof artifacts
  8. DeepMind account of computer checking
  9. Precise translated question and assumptions
  10. AlphaGeometry study and benchmark results
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.