AIProofWatch
← Explore interestsIndividual problem

Parisi–Zamponi–Claude: an analytic proof of the jamming exponent identity

Parisi and Zamponi give an analytic proof of a+b=1 from the scaling full replica-symmetry-breaking equations for infinite-dimensional hard-sphere jamming.

Progress records 1

Understand the problem ↓

1 record · How we rate progress

Parisi–Zamponi–Claude: an analytic proof of the jamming exponent identity

Parisi and Zamponi give an analytic proof of a+b=1 from the scaling full replica-symmetry-breaking equations for infinite-dimensional hard-sphere jamming. Together with the earlier relation b=(1+c)/2, it yields the scaling identities linking force, gap and overlap exponents.

Read original source Parisi–Zamponi: precise identity, assumptions and AI disclosurearxiv.org

Original report: 2026-06-02

Understanding the problem

Read the background

Parisi and Zamponi give an analytic proof of a+b=1 from the scaling full replica-symmetry-breaking equations for infinite-dimensional hard-sphere jamming. Together with the earlier relation b=(1+c)/2, it yields the scaling identities linking force, gap and overlap exponents.

The 2014 fullRSB calculation established one scaling relation analytically, while a+b=1 was observed numerically without an analytic proof. Independent mechanical-marginal-stability arguments predicted the resulting physical exponent relations.

Why it matters

If correct, replaces a longstanding numerical observation with an analytic derivation and connects two notions of marginal stability within the specified mathematical model.

What counts as progress

A sourced advance or substantial formalization with the exact target, hypotheses, baseline and AI role stated. Importance and verification are assessed separately.

What to watch for

  • Compare the precise hypotheses and baseline; retain human and prior-work attribution.
  • The result is within the infinite-dimensional fullRSB scaling equations and their assumptions. It is not a proof of every finite-dimensional jamming law. The paper reports human checking and lists a journal publication; AIProofWatch has not audited the proof or independently reproduced a check. Its mathematical-physics statement is in scope despite the source’s condensed-matter category.

Background review: 2026-10-11. Selected sources:

Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.