Kaplansky’s idempotent conjecture in characteristic zero
Follow the latest progress by email.
Kaplansky’s characteristic-zero idempotent question asks whether every scalar idempotent of R[G] is 0 or 1 when G is torsion-free and R is a commutative characteristic-zero domain. Matrix idempotents and positive-characteristic coefficients are separate settings.
Why it matters and what counts as progress
Why it matters: It asks whether the absence of group torsion forces this basic ring-theoretic rigidity throughout characteristic zero.
What counts as progress: Exclude every nontrivial scalar idempotent for torsion-free groups over characteristic-zero domains. Matrix idempotents and positive characteristic are separate targets.
How the problem developed
Irving Kaplansky Kaplansky published a list of ring-theory problems that shaped the conjectures now commonly associated with his name; later sources note that an original citation for the specific idempotent conjecture is elusive.
OpenAI Released a Bass-trace manuscript deriving that every scalar idempotent in R[G] is 0 or 1 for torsion-free discrete G and commutative characteristic-zero domains R.
AI contribution
The Bass trace conjecture and the characteristic-zero Kaplansky idempotent conjecture
For every torsion-free discrete group G and commutative characteristic-zero domain R, the OpenAI Bass manuscript claims each scalar idempotent in R[G] is 0 or 1. The separate trace-rank assertion concerns algebraic K₀(C[G]).
Sources
- K- and L-theory of Group Rings, International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 proceedings
- OpenAI, Bass trace manuscript and idempotent corollary
- Bass manuscript torsion-free corollary
- The Bass trace conjecture and the characteristic-zero Kaplansky idempotent conjecture
- Lean proof of the torsion-free corollary
- Comparator theorem configuration
Website timeline
Publication dates and editorial changes.
OpenAI reports a characteristic-zero Kaplansky idempotent result