Quantitative Hilbert–Schmidt stability of lamplighter relations
Follow the latest progress by email.
For approximate finite-dimensional unitary representations of the lamplighter group, seek nearby exact representations with polynomial control of Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius. The hypotheses impose approximate order-two and orbit-commutator relations through 2M, with M polynomial in the target tolerance.
Why it matters and what counts as progress
Why it matters: It asks for explicit quantitative stability in an infinitely presented group, where an uncontrolled existence statement would give less information.
What counts as progress: A smaller polynomial dependence of stability radius or rate on tolerance, or an explicit nearby exact representation under weaker approximate relations.
How the problem developed
- 22 Jul 2026 · Quantitative stability result [1]
Alon Dogon and Thomas Vidick Established explicit polynomial bounds on the lamplighter group's Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius, answering a question of Dogon, Levit and Vigdorovich.
AI contribution
Polynomial Hilbert-Schmidt stability of the lamplighter group
For finite-dimensional unitaries satisfying approximate order-two and orbit-commutator relations through 2M, with M polynomial in the target tolerance, Dogon and Vidick prove nearby exact lamplighter relations. Their argument gives polynomial upper bounds on Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius.
Sources
Website timeline
Publication dates and editorial changes.
ChatGPT improvement yields polynomial lamplighter stability bounds