Quantitative Hilbert–Schmidt stability of lamplighter relations

For approximate finite-dimensional unitary representations of the lamplighter group, seek nearby exact representations with polynomial control of Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius. The hypotheses impose approximate order-two and orbit-commutator relations through 2M, with M polynomial in the target tolerance.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: It asks for explicit quantitative stability in an infinitely presented group, where an uncontrolled existence statement would give less information.

What counts as progress: A smaller polynomial dependence of stability radius or rate on tolerance, or an explicit nearby exact representation under weaker approximate relations.

How the problem developed

  1. 22 Jul 2026 · Quantitative stability result [1]

    Alon Dogon and Thomas Vidick Established explicit polynomial bounds on the lamplighter group's Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius, answering a question of Dogon, Levit and Vigdorovich.

AI contribution

Polynomial Hilbert-Schmidt stability of the lamplighter group

Alon Dogon, Thomas Vidick

For finite-dimensional unitaries satisfying approximate order-two and orbit-commutator relations through 2M, with M polynomial in the target tolerance, Dogon and Vidick prove nearby exact lamplighter relations. Their argument gives polynomial upper bounds on Hilbert–Schmidt stability rate and radius.

AI involvementAI-centered
ImportanceNotable
Human understandingFull
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Dogon and Vidick, lamplighter stability radius
  2. Earlier stability-radius question
  3. Lamplighter Lean development
  4. Lamplighter statement comparator
  5. Formal theorem comparison
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.