Triangular-lattice minimality for planar Coulomb renormalized energy

Does the density-one triangular lattice minimize planar Coulomb renormalized energy among all admissible full-plane configurations? The formulation uses a unit neutralizing background and the manuscript’s admissible square-cutoff families.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: The minimum determines a crystallization target and, through a prior equivalence, the linear term of optimal spherical logarithmic energy.

What counts as progress: A matching lower bound for the entire admissible class, rather than only lattices or periodic configurations, or an admissible configuration with smaller energy.

How the problem developed

  1. 2012 · Conjecture [1]

    Étienne Sandier and Sylvia Serfaty Introduced the planar Coulomb renormalized energy and conjectured that its minimizer is the Abrikosov triangular lattice; triangular minimality among lattices was known, but the unrestricted problem remained open.

  2. 23 Sept 2026 · Reported claim [2]

    OpenAI The preprint claims triangular-lattice minimality over the stated admissible curl-free fields with unit uniform background.

AI contribution

Triangular minimality for planar Coulomb renormalized energy

OpenAI

For the manuscript’s unit-background planar Coulomb renormalized-energy class and admissible square-cutoff families, every admissible field has energy at least that of the density-one triangular lattice. A prior equivalence then identifies the linear term of optimal spherical logarithmic energy.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceMajor
Technical verificationPartial
Human understandingFew
Reported

Sources

  1. Sandier and Serfaty, 2D Coulomb gases and the renormalized energy
  2. OpenAI, triangular minimality for planar Coulomb energy
  3. Triangular minimality for planar Coulomb renormalized energy
  4. OpenAI, exact interval-certificate scope
  5. OpenAI mathematics collection and provenance
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.