Orbit gaps for powers of quadratic Pisot numbers

For a quadratic Pisot number α>1, how can the fractional parts of ξαⁿ fail to be uniformly distributed? The studied criterion concerns roots of X²−aX−b and coefficients ξ in the paper’s class C(α).

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: A sufficient gap criterion gives concrete partial information on a wider non-equidistribution problem that remains open.

What counts as progress: An explicit interval missed by each allowed orbit under A(α)<1, or a stronger criterion, retaining the restriction on ξ and the quadratic conjugate.

How the problem developed

  1. 1993 · Open problem [1][2]

    Michel Mendès France Restated the classical question of whether powers of rational numbers greater than one are dense modulo one; Bugeaud later formulated the broader Pisot-number version as Problem 10.61.

  2. 31 Aug 2026 · Criterion [3][4]

    Ralf Stephan; Claude Opus 5 agents Registered a Lean-formalized criterion for quadratic Pisot numbers: under a stated exponent condition, every orbit in the associated Cantor set misses an open interval; the paper gives α=2+√5 as an instance.

AI contribution

AI-led Lean proof gives a quadratic orbit-gap criterion

For a quadratic real root α>1 of X²−aX−b whose conjugate has modulus below one, the Route A exponent condition A(α)<1 gives an open interval missed by every orbit (ξαⁿ mod 1) with ξ in the paper’s class C(α), so none is uniformly distributed. The criterion is equivalent to (log₂α−1)(log₂(α/|b|)−1)>1 and yields an explicit gap for α=2+√5.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceModest
Human understandingFew
Reported

Sources

  1. Michel Mendès France, Remarks and problems on finite and periodic continued fractions (1993)
  2. Yann Bugeaud, Distribution Modulo One and Diophantine Approximation (2012), Problem 10.61
  3. Ralf Stephan, Lean formalization toward Bugeaud Problem 10.61, Palomar record (2026)
  4. Ralf Stephan, quadratic Pisot Cantor-set formalization and disclosure
  5. Stephan, quadratic criterion and verification record
  6. Stephan, compared quadratic statements
  7. Bugeaud, Problem 10.61
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.