Reversible prime-field modular inversion

Given nonzero w modulo a prime p, how efficiently can a reversible circuit compute w⁻¹ mod p? The task includes retaining enough information to reverse Euclidean or divstep updates.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: Modular inversion exposes a trade-off between arithmetic gates and the qubits needed to make classical updates reversible.

What counts as progress: A reversible architecture with improved Toffoli–qubit trade-offs, with the prime size, allowed failures and uncomputation costs fixed.

How the problem developed

  1. 15 Oct 2026 · Architecture [1]

    Andi Gu, Alek H. Kemeny, Susanne F. Yelin and Mikhail D. Lukin Introduced a reversible prime-field modular-inversion architecture in a study of circuit costs for eight quantum-computing tasks.

AI contribution

Discovering state-of-the-art quantum circuits with large language models

Andi Gu, Alek H. Kemeny, Susanne F. Yelin, Mikhail D. Lukin

Gu, Kemeny, Yelin and Lukin report lower Toffoli and peak-qubit counts in seven specified circuit benchmarks, plus a new prime-field modular-inversion architecture. For fixed-point Gaussian evaluation, their stated benchmark falls from about 24,000 Toffolis and 362 qubits to 1,583 Toffolis and 139 qubits; the reported worst-case error is 9.99×10⁻⁸.

AI involvementAI-autonomous
ImportanceNotable
Technical verificationPartial
Human understandingFull
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Collected source version
  2. Original statement and human–AI provenance
  3. Full task specifications, comparison table and limitations
  4. Pinned author circuit/evaluator artifact
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.