Holonomicity of fixed-offset restricted-permutation counts

For fixed r,s≥1, let aᵣ,ₛ(n) count permutations forbidding πᵢ₊ᵣ−πᵢ=s and bᵣ,ₛ(n) count those forbidding the corresponding absolute difference. Are both sequences holonomic, meaning they satisfy polynomial-coefficient linear recurrences?

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: An all-parameter result would extend isolated computed recurrences to an entire restricted-permutation family.

What counts as progress: A recurrence-existence proof for every fixed r,s, or a nonholonomic parameter pair; guessed finite-data recurrences require proof.

How the problem developed

  1. 2023 · Open challenge [1]

    George Spahn and Doron Zeilberger Posed a challenge asking whether the restricted-permutation counts aᵣ,ₛ(n) and bᵣ,ₛ(n) are holonomic for every r,s>1.

  2. 11 Aug 2026 · Solution [2]

    Jaideep Sai Padhi Reported an affirmative proof for both count families for all r,s>1, as one of five solved enumerative-combinatorics challenges.

AI contribution

Solutions to Five Challenge Problems in Enumerative and Algorithmic Combinatorics, with an Account of the Human-Machine Methodology Employed

Jaideep Sai Padhi

For every fixed r,s≥1, both restricted-permutation count sequences a_(r,s)(n), forbidding π_(i+r)−π_i=s, and b_(r,s)(n), forbidding the corresponding absolute difference, are claimed to be holonomic. The argument uses an interleaving bijection with finitely many seams and D-finite closure.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceNotable
Technical verificationPartial
Human understandingFew
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Spahn and Zeilberger, Counting Permutations Where the Difference Between Entries Located r Places Apart Can Never Be s
  2. Jaideep Sai Padhi, Solutions to Five Challenge Problems in Enumerative and Algorithmic Combinatorics
  3. Padhi, Solutions to Five Challenge Problems in Enumerative and Algorithmic Combinatorics
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.