Linearity of sphere-covering non-expansive maps between Banach balls

Let F map the closed unit ball of a real Banach space X non-expansively into that of Y. If F sends sphere points to sphere points and its image covers the entire unit sphere of Y, must it extend to a surjective real-linear isometry?

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: The condition offers a general rigidity criterion for ball maps beyond special-space plasticity results.

What counts as progress: A rigidity proof or counterexample under exactly the sphere-preservation and sphere-coverage assumptions; injectivity and interior coverage are not assumed.

How the problem developed

  1. 20 Oct 2026 · Theorem claim [1]

    Kaarel August Kurik Claimed that every non-expansive map between real Banach unit balls whose image covers the unit sphere and sends sphere points to sphere points is the restriction of a surjective linear isometry.

AI contribution

Non-expansive maps between unit balls that send the sphere onto the sphere are linear isometries

Kaarel August Kurik

Let X and Y be real Banach spaces and F:B_X→B_Y be non-expansive on their closed unit balls. If F(S_X)⊆S_Y⊆F(B_X), then F is the restriction of a surjective real-linear isometry X→Y. Sphere coverage is required; coverage of the ball’s interior and injectivity are not assumed.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceNotable
Technical verificationReported
Human understandingFew
Paper date:

Sources

  1. Kaarel August Kurik, Sphere-preserving ball maps and AI disclosure
  2. Kurik: sphere-preserving ball maps and AI disclosure
  3. Prove2Me: exact nonzero-space rigidity statement
  4. Prove2Me: quantitative common-face rigidity statement
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.