Direct finiteness of positive-characteristic group rings with torsion

Is every group ring directly finite: does ab=1 imply ba=1? The studied test is scalar elements over a finite characteristic-two field and a finitely presented group with odd-prime torsion.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: A scalar counterexample would go beyond a matrix defect and the classes already known to be directly finite, including sofic groups.

What counts as progress: Explicit scalar a,b with ab=1 and ba≠1, or a theorem ruling them out; the field must be specified rather than automatically identified with F₂.

How the problem developed

  1. 2004 · Theorem [1]

    Gábor Elek and Endre Szabó Proved direct finiteness for group rings of sofic groups over arbitrary fields, a positive result under a group-theoretic restriction.

  2. 23 Sept 2026 · Counterexample claim [2][3]

    OpenAI The manuscript reports a characteristic-two counterexample to Kaplansky direct finiteness using a group with odd-prime torsion.

AI contribution

A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two

OpenAI

There are a finite field K of characteristic two, a finitely presented group G containing odd-prime torsion, and scalar a,b in K[G] with ab=1 but ba≠1. The manuscript gives a terminating prescription for the witness; it does not assert K=F₂.

AI involvementAI-led
ImportanceMajor
Human understandingFew
Reported

Sources

  1. Gábor Elek and Endre Szabó, Sofic groups and direct finiteness
  2. OpenAI, A Counterexample to Kaplansky’s Direct Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two
  3. OpenAI Lean documentation for group-ring direct finiteness
  4. A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two
  5. Characteristic-two direct-finiteness manuscript
  6. Direct-finiteness Lean theorem
  7. Formalization scope
  8. Torsion-free direct-finiteness companion
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.