Zarankiewicz’s complete-bipartite crossing-number formula

Does the ordinary crossing number of Kₘ,ₙ equal ⌊m/2⌋⌊(m−1)/2⌋⌊n/2⌋⌊(n−1)/2⌋ for all positive m,n? Drawings use continuous simple edge paths in the plane.

Why it matters and what counts as progress

Why it matters: The formula would prove optimality of the classical complete-bipartite drawing beyond the known small-part cases.

What counts as progress: A matching lower bound for all part sizes, a new proved range, or a drawing beating the formula, with the ordinary drawing convention retained.

How the problem developed

  1. 23 Sept 2026 · Reported theorem [1][2]

    OpenAI Reported the formula cr(Kₘ,ₙ) = ⌊m/2⌋⌊(m−1)/2⌋⌊n/2⌋⌊(n−1)/2⌋ for all positive m and n.

AI contribution

Sources

  1. Zarankiewicz, On a problem of P. Turán concerning graphs
  2. OpenAI complete-bipartite crossing-number manuscript
  3. Formalization scope for bipartite crossings
  4. Lean proof of the Zarankiewicz formula
  5. OpenAI crossing-results overview
  6. OpenAI mathematics release account
Website timeline

Publication dates and editorial changes.