What was already known
A base-ten existence argument using trailing-zero padding was known. It did not require roots coprime to the base or give this quantitative all-base count.
AI involvement
The author-submitted account credits models with jointly developing the carry-free Sidon-set construction under human direction. The author reports checking the statements and proofs; the manuscript also credits models with much of its writing.
The retained carry-free Sidon construction for the assessed quantitative digit-sum theorem was jointly worked out with models under human direction.
Importance
The carry-free construction strengthens existence to an explicit all-base count with coprime roots.
Limitations
The formal check covers the prescribed-digit-sum construction, not the manuscript’s broader local-limit, sieve or prime-value theorems. The detailed model-origin account comes from the author-submitted registry entry.
Technical verification
The author reports checking all proofs, and the specific Theorem 1.8 digit-sum construction is represented by sorry-free Lean statements with no paper-specific axioms; a registry audit compared the statement to the submitted claim. This does not elevate the broader square local-limit theorem, whose shrinking-frequency estimates remain outside the Lean proof.
Independent checking
Author review of statements and proofs as stated in the author-submitted registry account
- Checker
- vibefrtz, pseudonymous paper author
- Scope
- Theorem 1.8 quantitative all-base prescribed square-digit-sum result
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Formal checking
Sorry-free formal proof with axiom audit containing only Lean's standard axioms
- Checker
- Lean 4/mathlib kernel on DSS.sq_digit_sum_count and sq_digit_sum_count_two
- Scope
- The explicit prescribed-digit-sum count with coprime roots in every base
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.
Human understanding
The author jointly worked out the Sidon construction and verified the argument, documenting understanding of the carry-free counting mechanism.
Correction and publication history
Initial publication of this result.
Read this published revision