What was already known
The conjecture asks whether vanishing moments of P force eventual vanishing of mixed moments QP^m. A route from the announced Jacobian counterexample gives a nonexplicit failure in dimension 158; these small explicit examples are separate constructions.
What changed and why it matters
Refutes the Gaussian Moments Conjecture with small explicit witnesses, beyond a nonconstructive implication in a much larger dimension.
The AI contribution
The AI-provenance section states that ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Pro produced the four-variable example after a human prompt, and Claude Fable 5 produced the three-variable example after receiving it. Long takes responsibility for the mathematics and exposition.
Limitations
Complex coefficients are essential. Dimension two remains unsettled, and dimension one was already established. These examples were not derived from the coordinates of the Jacobian counterexample. The manuscript’s algebraic checks by Claude are not independent human verification. AIProofWatch reviewed the theorem, comparison and full-text AI disclosure, not the complete proof.
Verification evidence
Evidence labels show what supports the claim. Importance rates its impact if correct.
Author claim
The source reports this precise contribution; statement review does not establish a proof audit.
Accessible artifact / proof
Accessible supporting proof or code; not compiled or reproduced by AIProofWatch.
Correction and publication history
Public-discussion audit found this substantive scoped contribution missing. Source statement, baseline, attribution and importance reviewed; no full proof audit. Historical addition without subscriber alerts.
Read this published revision