Aristotle formalizes five IMO 2025 solutions

Harmonic reports that Aristotle generated machine-verified solutions for 2025 IMO Problems 1–5 from human-formalized problem statements, with the Lean proofs published.

Sources for this record

What was already known

AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2 produced formal solutions for four 2024 IMO problems, for a silver-level score. In 2025, Seed-Prover also announced gold-level formally checked performance, while Gemini Deep Think and OpenAI reported gold-level natural-language solutions. Harmonic identifies Aristotle’s distinct proof-search and lemma-formalization system as its contribution (Harmonic report, §§1, 3.1, 4).

AI involvement AI-led

Harmonic reports that people translated only the six contest problem statements; Aristotle generated the solution arguments, auxiliary lemmas and their formalizations, then used compiler feedback. Problem 3 answer candidates were generated by a language model with basic computational tools.

Harmonic reports that people manually translated only the contest problem statements; Aristotle produced proof arguments, auxiliary lemmas and their formalizations.

Importance Modest

The result shows a separate AI system producing five complete formal solutions to known high-level competition problems.

Limitations

The source reports that people translated each original statement into Lean. The solutions are for known contest problems; no open research theorem is resolved. This review inspected the paper and repository listing but did not rebuild the Lean project or audit all dependencies.

Technical verification Formal (Lean 4)

Harmonic reports complete machine-checked solutions to the human-formalized statements of Problems 1–5 and publishes the Lean repository. This assessment did not rebuild or audit dependencies.

Formal checking

Harmonic reports complete Lean 4 proofs without sorryAx for Problems 1–5 and publishes the proof repository. Source-reported scope; local build and dependency audit were not done.

Checker
Harmonic-reported Lean 4 checker
Scope
Human-formalized statements of 2025 IMO Problems 1–5 and the system-generated proofs.
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Partial

Harmonic’s authors explain the main devices in the non-geometry solutions, including the derangement route for Problem 1 and auxiliary definitions for Problems 3 and 5; the reviewed account gives less explanation of the geometry solution’s central mechanism.

Correction and publication history

2026-10-18 · publication

Primary-source claim review for the What AI Found discovery index; non-notifying local inclusion.

Read this published revision