The equality case of Ehrhart's volume conjecture

Jihao Liu

Liu claims that a full-dimensional compact convex body in Rⁿ with barycenter zero, zero as its only interior lattice point and volume (n+1)ⁿ/n! is an integral unimodular image of the centered simplex (n+1)Δₙ−(1,…,1).

Sources for this record

What was already known

OpenAI’s earlier work proved the sharp volume inequality, while the equality case remained open beyond dimension two and special classes. Liu already knew the K-stability/Fano equality analogy.

AI involvement AI-centered

Liu proposed the initial analogy and saturation route. Danus supplied the central radial-degeneration, Prékopa-rigidity and critical-lattice mechanisms and a complete proof; Liu explained and polished it.

Danus supplied the central new second-half mechanisms and complete argument within a project and first-half strategy initiated by Liu.

Importance Major

Completes the equality characterization in Ehrhart’s longstanding volume conjecture.

Limitations

Liu reports human verification but does not specify its coverage or a completed rigorous review of the whole theorem. Danus’s internal checking process has no public certificate in the cited account.

Technical verification Partial

The author reports human verification after Danus produced the complete proof, but does not describe its coverage or a completed rigorous check of Theorem 1.3. This supports only a partial rating. Danus's internal proof-checking pipeline is opaque and is not counted as a documented machine method.

Independent checking

post-generation human verification and polishing reported by the author

Checker
Jihao Liu, author
Scope
The final proof of the equality characterization in Theorem 1.3, with exact checked scope unspecified
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Human understanding Full

Liu identifies the human starting analogy, explains the all-point jet saturation, toric degeneration, Prékopa rigidity and critical-lattice endgame, and distinguishes what Danus discovered beyond the analogy.

Correction and publication history