What was already known
The O(1/k²) objective-value rate was known, but point convergence at the critical r=3 schedule remained open. Results for r>3 and other regimes did not settle this case.
AI involvement
GPT-5 Pro supplied the continuous-time proof after extensive interaction and failed attempts. Jang and Ryu filtered and verified it, then developed the discrete adaptation.
The model supplied the central continuous-time proof argument after extensive human direction and filtering; humans translated it to discrete NAG.
Importance
Answers the critical point-convergence question for a foundational accelerated method.
Limitations
Jang and Ryu explicitly checked the AI-origin continuous-time proof. The discrete adaptation has no separately documented completed check. A withdrawn r∈[1,3) extension is excluded; a concurrent human discrete-time result exists.
Technical verification
The authors explicitly report verifying a complete GPT-5 Pro proof of Theorem 2 on a later prompted trial. This completed human check covers the AI-origin continuous argument, not a separately documented full check of the discrete adaptation; the r<3 error is a different claim.
Formal checking
Human verification of a complete generated proof obtained on the third trial in October 2025
- Checker
- Uijeong Jang and Ernest K. Ryu
- Scope
- Theorem 2 point convergence of the r=3 Nesterov ODE
- Basis
- Reported by the linked checker
Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.
Human understanding
The authors explain the energy-difference argument that forces all cluster points to coincide and adapt it to the discrete algorithm.
Correction and publication history
Answers the critical point-convergence question for a foundational accelerated method.
Read this published revision