What was already known
Earlier corrected inequalities covered certain Fano threefold polarizations. An uncorrected bound for every volume is false.
AI involvement
The theorem appears in an OpenAI-authored model-produced manuscript; no named human checker or explanation of this numerical argument is documented.
OpenAI is credited as author of the manuscript and attributes repository results to its internal model; autonomy details are absent.
- Supporting source (openai.com) — October 6 release, model origin
Importance
Would extend a corrected Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality to every polarized smooth complex threefold.
Limitations
The all-volume estimate and uniform large-volume tail are manuscript claims without a documented complete human or machine check. No condition on K_X is assumed.
Technical verification
The manuscript states a proof strategy and theorem, but no completed human or machine check of this precise all-threefold inequality was documented.
Human understanding
Default for missing evidence: no named human explanation of the central fixed-volume estimate and wall argument was found.
Correction and publication history
Would extend a corrected Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality to every polarized smooth complex threefold.
Read this published revision