OpenAI reports a nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone

An explicit homogeneous hyperbolic polynomial of degree 20 in 23 real variables has a closed hyperbolicity cone that cannot be represented as the positive-semidefinite region of any finite real symmetric linear matrix pencil in the original variables.

Sources for this record

What was already known

The three-variable Lax conjecture was proved by Helton and Vinnikov. In higher dimension, Brändén ruled out determinant representations for powers of a particular polynomial, but that did not rule out a different determinant defining the same cone; Kummer exhibited this distinction (companion manuscript introduction, Historical context, p. 2).

AI involvement AI-led

OpenAI credits itself as manuscript author and states that its internal frontier model produced the results in this release. Individual human input is not detailed enough to establish task-only autonomy.

OpenAI is named as author on the manuscript, and its release attributes the results to an internal frontier model. The individual human input is not detailed enough to establish autonomy.

Importance Major

Disproves the geometric Generalized Lax conjecture that every hyperbolicity cone is spectrahedral.

Limitations

The selected cone is nonspectrahedral in its original variables. This does not imply it lacks an auxiliary-variable semidefinite lift; the family’s stronger projected-Lax counterexample is a separate unformalized claim. Theorem 1.1 uses a degree-20 polynomial; its degree-16 quotient appears in Corollary 1.2.

Technical verification Formal (Lean 4)

OpenAI reports a Lean proof matching the selected claim.

Formal checking

The pinned Lean note matches Theorem 1.1 of the companion: an explicit degree-20 hyperbolic polynomial in 23 variables whose cone has no spectrahedral representation.

Checker
OpenAI-reported Lean 4 / Comparator
Scope
The explicit degree-20 homogeneous polynomial in 23 real variables is hyperbolic, and its closed hyperbolicity cone is not the positive-semidefinite region of any finite symmetric linear matrix pencil.
Basis
Reported by the linked checker
Evidence source

Checking a formal statement does not establish that it matches the original problem.

Human understanding Few

Few is the default when evidence for a higher level is insufficient. No named person is documented as explaining the central argument for this assessed contribution.

Correction and publication history

2026-10-18 · publication

Primary companion manuscript, attribution, prior-work, and exact Lean-scope review for non-notifying local inclusion.

Read this published revision