What was already known
The proposed convex-optimization estimate sought a linear-in-vertices error for general-graph perfect matchings. Stronger weighted Bethe comparisons were known for bipartite graphs.
AI involvement
OpenAI attributes the central inequality to an internal model; autonomy of this individual research run is undocumented.
The central entropy inequality is in the model-produced manuscript; autonomy of this individual run is undocumented.
Importance
Claims the proposed linear-error estimate for general-graph perfect matchings.
Limitations
The exact pointwise coefficient remains unverified in the released Lean comparator; a completed Lean file proves a weaker nonlinear defect bound. The deterministic counting algorithm in the manuscript is a separate result.
Technical verification
The manuscript states and proves the sharp pointwise bound, but the released comparator for that statement still has sorry. A separate completed Lean file proves a weaker nonlinear defect and counting bound, not this precise inequality. No complete human check of the assessed claim is documented, so Reported is the evidence default.
Human understanding
No named human explanation of the tight odd-cut face-dimension and entropy-duality mechanism is documented; Few is the evidence default.
Correction and publication history
Claims a linear-error entropy estimate for general-graph perfect matchings.
Read this published revision